<!-- https://stopbdsintoronto.ca/evidence/ontario-bill-202-2016/ -->
<!-- Published 2026-09-21 · Updated 2026-09-21 · Toronto Coalition Against Racist Boycotts -->

## Document record

- Publisher: Legislative Assembly of Ontario (41st Parliament, 1st Session)
- Date: 2016-05-19
- Type: Primary record
- Establishes: That second reading of Bill 202, the Standing Up Against Anti-Semitism in Ontario Act, 2016, was lost on division on 19 May 2016 by 18 ayes to 39 nays.
- Original: https://www.ola.org/en/legislative-business/house-documents/parliament-41/session-1/2016-05-19/votes-proceedings
- Archived copy: No archived copy yet.
- Citation id: S235
# Ontario Votes and Proceedings, 19 May 2016

## What this document is

This is the Legislative Assembly of Ontario's official minute for Thursday 19 May 2016, in the 41st Parliament, 1st Session. It records the disposition of second reading of Bill 202, the Standing Up Against Anti-Semitism in Ontario Act, 2016, together with the names of every member voting on each side [S235]. The bill itself was sponsored by Tim Hudak and Mike Colle, and had carried first reading on 20 April 2016 [S015].

## What it establishes

Second reading was lost on a recorded division: 18 ayes and 39 nays [S235]. The eighteen members voting in favour were Arnott, Bailey, Coe, Colle, Fedeli, Hardeman, Harris, Hudak, Martow, McDonell, McNaughton, Munro, Pettapiece, Smith, Thompson, Walker, Wilson and Yakabuski [S235]. Thirty-nine members voted against [S235].

Because the bill died at second reading, Ontario enacted nothing. This matters for two reasons. It is the reason this site says the province has passed a resolution against BDS but no legislation restricting boycott activity, and it sits directly beside Motion 36, carried eighteen months later, which was a statement of opinion rather than a law. The conventional way to write the result is ayes first: eighteen in favour to thirty-nine against. Writing it as "39–18" invites a reader to think the larger number supported the bill.

## Key passages

The disposition reads "Lost on the following division" [S235]. The Assembly's own bill page records the same outcome as "Lost on recorded division" at second reading [S015].

## How it is used on this site

The defeat is cited in the [key facts](/key-facts/) table and on the [timeline](/timeline/), and it supports the statement on [Is BDS legal in Canada?](/claims/is-bds-legal-in-canada/) that no Ontario statute restricts boycott advocacy.

## Provenance and access

Both documents are published by the Legislative Assembly at ola.org, which refuses automated requests. The bill page has an Internet Archive snapshot, recorded above in the source entry for that page. No archived copy of the Votes and Proceedings for 19 May 2016, the record that carries the division, was located. The debate is in the Hansard transcript for the same sitting day.

## Page history

2026-09-21: First draft.